IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v31y2022i4p1003-1027.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Transparency and Voice on Managerial Decisions and Employee Effort in Hierarchical Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Xi (Jason) Kuang
  • Ziyang Li
  • Di Yang

Abstract

Organizations often promote procedural justice by increasing the transparency of managerial decisions and encouraging employees’ voice in the decision process. We experimentally investigate how implementing these control policies in hierarchical organizations (owners vs. managers vs. employees) affects managers’ resource-allocation decision and employee effort. We predict and find that managers allocate more resources to employees, lowering owners’ return, when the allocation decision is transparent than when it is not transparent, despite being incentivized to increase owners’ return. Further, managers allocate more resources to employees when employees can voice their desired outcome than when employees’ voice is not allowed, but only if the allocation decision is transparent. Managers’ intention to exchange gifts with employees mediates these effects. We also find that, when employees have a voice, their effort is influenced by whether the allocation reaches their desired level. The implications of our findings for management control theory and practice are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Xi (Jason) Kuang & Ziyang Li & Di Yang, 2022. "The Effects of Transparency and Voice on Managerial Decisions and Employee Effort in Hierarchical Organizations," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 1003-1027, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1003-1027
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180.2021.1896370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09638180.2021.1896370
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638180.2021.1896370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:31:y:2022:i:4:p:1003-1027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.