IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/entreg/v32y2020i7-8p531-554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Re-examining the opportunity pull and necessity push debate: contexts and abilities

Author

Listed:
  • Alona Martiarena

Abstract

This study explores how different groups of workers, according to their ability level, respond to ‘push’ and ‘pull’ factors as local labour market conditions change. Arguments based on the opportunity cost of a transition to entrepreneurship serve to link individual-level motivations, which relate to ‘pull’ or ‘push’ factors, with contextual variations, which capture the scenarios in which individuals evaluate their occupational choice. Micro-level panel data on career histories reveal that overall entries into self-employment tend to be pro-cyclical, though the relationship is moderated by individual ability levels. The negative effect of the local unemployment level is attenuated and even reverses for the least able workers; self-employment entry probability instead is highest among the ablest workers across most stages of the business cycle. The results also reveal that large urban settings provide refuge for low ability individuals, who are less likely to resort to self-employment during economic downturns.

Suggested Citation

  • Alona Martiarena, 2020. "Re-examining the opportunity pull and necessity push debate: contexts and abilities," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7-8), pages 531-554, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:entreg:v:32:y:2020:i:7-8:p:531-554
    DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2019.1675776
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08985626.2019.1675776
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08985626.2019.1675776?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alona Martiarena & Jonathan Levie & Susan Marlow & Mark Hart & Karen Bonner, 2023. "A ‘deviant men’ theory of business expectations in nascent entrepreneurs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(3), pages 909-930, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:entreg:v:32:y:2020:i:7-8:p:531-554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TEPN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.