IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/emetrv/v41y2022i8p966-984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensively testing linearity hypothesis using the smooth transition autoregressive model

Author

Listed:
  • Dakyung Seong
  • Jin Seo Cho
  • Timo Teräsvirta

Abstract

This article examines the null limit distribution of the quasi-likelihood ratio (QLR) statistic for testing linearity condition against the smooth transition autoregressive (STAR) model. We explicitly show that the QLR test statistic weakly converges to a functional of a multivariate Gaussian process under the null of linearity, which is done by resolving the issue of identification problem arises in two different ways under the null. In contrast with the Lagrange multiplier test that is widely employed for testing the linearity condition, the proposed QLR statistic has an omnibus power, and thus, it complements the existing testing procedure. We show the empirical relevance of our test by testing the neglected nonlinearity of the US fiscal multipliers and growth rates of US unemployment. These empirical examples demonstrate that the QLR test is useful for detecting the nonlinear structure among economic variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Dakyung Seong & Jin Seo Cho & Timo Teräsvirta, 2022. "Comprehensively testing linearity hypothesis using the smooth transition autoregressive model," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 966-984, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:41:y:2022:i:8:p:966-984
    DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2022.2091713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2022.2091713
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07474938.2022.2091713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:41:y:2022:i:8:p:966-984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.