IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/emetrv/v36y2017i4p447-467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Signal extraction goodness-of-fit diagnostic tests under model parameter uncertainty: Formulations and empirical evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Blakely
  • Tucker McElroy

Abstract

We present a time-domain goodness-of-fit (gof) diagnostic test that is based on signal-extraction variances for nonstationary time series. This diagnostic test extends the time-domain gof statistic of Maravall (2003) by taking into account the effects of model parameter uncertainty, utilizing theoretical results of McElroy and Holan (2009). We demonstrate that omitting this correction results in a severely undersized statistic. Adequate size and power are obtained in Monte Carlo studies for fairly short time series (10 to 15 years of monthly data). Our Monte Carlo studies of finite sample size and power consider different combinations of both signal and noise components using seasonal, trend, and irregular component models obtained via canonical decomposition. Details of the implementation appropriate for SARIMA models are given. We apply the gof diagnostic test statistics to several U.S. Census Bureau time series. The results generally corroborate the output of the automatic model selection procedure of the X-12-ARIMA software, which in contrast to our diagnostic test statistic does not involve hypothesis testing. We conclude that these diagnostic test statistics are a useful supplementary model-checking tool for practitioners engaged in the task of model-based seasonal adjustment.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Blakely & Tucker McElroy, 2017. "Signal extraction goodness-of-fit diagnostic tests under model parameter uncertainty: Formulations and empirical evaluation," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 447-467, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:36:y:2017:i:4:p:447-467
    DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2016.1140277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2016.1140277
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07474938.2016.1140277?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tucker McElroy & Anindya Roy, 2022. "A Review of Seasonal Adjustment Diagnostics," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(2), pages 259-284, August.
    2. Chen Baoline & McElroy Tucker S. & Pang Osbert C., 2022. "Assessing Residual Seasonality in the U.S. National Income and Product Accounts Aggregates," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 38(2), pages 399-428, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:36:y:2017:i:4:p:447-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.