Some comments on model development and posterior existence
AbstractWe wish to congratulate John Geweke on producing such an interesting and complete paper. We are delighted to see that serious attempts to make Bayesian methods more generally understood and available are being undertaken. In addition, a number of quite challenging issues is addressed here. Whereas we agree with most of what is stated in the paper, it is our (perceived) duty to single out those things that we feel are more contentious. However, we hope that this can lead to a stimulating discussion of general interest and hopefully to our better understanding of these issues.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Econometric Reviews.
Volume (Year): 18 (1999)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.