IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecinnt/v24y2015i3p183-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internationalisation of firms and their innovation and productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Iulia Siedschlag
  • Xiaoheng Zhang

Abstract

This paper examines the links between the internationalisation of firms and their innovation and productivity performance using data from Ireland over the period 2004-2008. Our econometric results indicate that, relative to firms that served the domestic market only, firms with international activities were more likely to invest in innovation, they were more likely to be successful in terms of innovation output, and they had a higher labour productivity. In line with the most recent literature on international trade with heterogeneous firms, our empirical evidence shows that, among firms with international activities, labour productivity was higher in foreign affiliates in comparison to domestic exporters.

Suggested Citation

  • Iulia Siedschlag & Xiaoheng Zhang, 2015. "Internationalisation of firms and their innovation and productivity," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 183-203, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:24:y:2015:i:3:p:183-203
    DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2014.918439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10438599.2014.918439
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10438599.2014.918439?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bettina Peters & Rebecca Riley & Iulia Siedschlag & Priit Vahter & John McQuinn, 2014. "Innovation and Productivity in Services: Evidence from Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2014-04, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Alejandro García-Pozo & Juan Antonio Campos-Soria & J. Aníbal Núñez-Carrasco, 2021. "Technological innovation and productivity across Spanish regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 67(1), pages 167-187, August.
    3. Audretsch, David & Hafenstein, Marian & Kritikos, Alexander S. & Schiersch, Alexander, 2018. "Firm Size and Innovation in the Service Sector," IZA Discussion Papers 12035, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Bettina Peters & Rebecca Riley & Iulia Siedschlag & Priit Vahter & John McQuinn, 2018. "Internationalisation, innovation and productivity in services: evidence from Germany, Ireland and the United Kingdom," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(3), pages 585-615, August.
    5. Antonelli, Cristiano & Feder, Christophe, 2020. "The new direction of technological change in the global economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1-12.
    6. Anabela Santos & Michele Cincera & Paulo Neto & Maria Manuel Serrano, 2019. "How internationalization and competitiveness contribute to get public support to innovation? The Portuguese case," GEE Papers 0121, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised May 2019.
    7. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    8. Anabela Santos & Michele Cincera & Paulo Neto & Maria Manuel Serrano, 2019. "Which projects are selected for an innovation subsidy? The Portuguese case," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 18(3), pages 165-202, October.
    9. Agárdi, Irma & Berezvai, Zombor & Alt, Mónika-Anetta, 2017. "A nemzetközi diverzifikáció, az innováció és a teljesítmény kapcsolata az európai élelmiszer-kiskereskedelemben [International diversification and the innovation activity and performance of leading," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 805-822.
    10. Jackson, Emerson Abraham, 2020. "Fostering Sustainable Innovation through Creative Destruction Theory," MPRA Paper 102174, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 21 Mar 2020.
    11. Di Ubaldo, Mattia & Siedschlag, Iulia, 2017. "The impact of investment in innovation on productivity: firm-level evidence from Ireland," Papers WP571, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    12. Stefania Cosci & Valentina Meliciani & Valentina Sabato, 2015. "Relationship Lending And Innovation: Empirical Evidence On A Sample Of European Firms," CERBE Working Papers wpC04, CERBE Center for Relationship Banking and Economics.
    13. Frick, F. & Jantke, C. & Sauer, J., 2018. "Innovation and Productivity in the Food vs. the High-Tech Manufacturing Sector," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277246, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Mattia Di Ubaldo & Iulia Siedschlag, 2021. "Investment in Knowledge‐Based Capital and Productivity: Firm‐Level Evidence from a Small Open Economy," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 67(2), pages 363-393, June.
    15. Arkady Trachuk & Natalia Linder, 2018. "Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Study of Russian Industrial Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03), pages 1-22, June.
    16. Verwaal, Ernst, 2017. "Global outsourcing, explorative innovation and firm financial performance: A knowledge-exchange based perspective," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 17-27.
    17. Stefania Cosci & Valentina Meliciani & Valentina Sabato, 2016. "Relationship lending and innovation: empirical evidence on a sample of European firms," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 335-357, June.
    18. Joseph Dery Nyeadi & Victor Kunsofah Kunbuor & Ernest Domanaanmwi Ganaa, 2018. "Innovation and Firm Productivity: Empirical Evidence from Ghana," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 14(5), pages 127-140, OCTOBER.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:24:y:2015:i:3:p:183-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GEIN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.