IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/deveza/v15y1998i3p449-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land degradation in South Africa: Conventional views, changing paradigms and a tradition of soil conservation

Author

Listed:
  • William RS Critchley
  • Escort Netshikovhela

Abstract

Land degradation is currently a major concern in South Africa. However, awareness of the problem and attitudes towards it have changed little over the past century. Soil erosion and veld degradation are continually being depicted as acute problems, and overpopulation, overstocking and poor agricultural practices are viewed as the major causal factors. Internationally, however, a new paradigm is emerging, which takes a somewhat more optimistic view of the situation in Africa. One of the basic tenets of this changing perception is that there exists an untapped wealth of indigenous knowledge about the environment and associated human potential. Within this context, this study examines and describes the local tradition of stone terracing on cropland within the former Venda in the Northern Province of South Africa. This living tradition has deep historic roots and local farmers have a remarkably well-developed understanding of the causes and effects of erosion. While the research location is unique in many ways, this study indicates that farmer tradition and innovation in the former homelands may be more common than has been supposed, and should not be ignored but actively sought out and built upon.

Suggested Citation

  • William RS Critchley & Escort Netshikovhela, 1998. "Land degradation in South Africa: Conventional views, changing paradigms and a tradition of soil conservation," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 449-469.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:15:y:1998:i:3:p:449-469
    DOI: 10.1080/03768359808440024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03768359808440024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03768359808440024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:15:y:1998:i:3:p:449-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.