IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v42y2020i3p525-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Left turn to legalism: fact-finding inquiries as political critique in 1970s India

Author

Listed:
  • Ankita Pandey

Abstract

A defining feature of governmental abuse of power is that it is rendered invisible; official records conceal the suffering of the victim. To claim justice, activists have to first establish and document those acts of abuse. This article looks at the practice of voluntary and independent fact-finding investigations undertaken by first-generation civil rights activists in India. Such fact-finding exercises multiplied in the aftermath of the Naxalite movement (1967–1972) and the imposition of the Internal Emergency (1975–1977). The article examines the practice of fact-finding in the 1970s as a mode of activism, and what it reveals about the variegated nature of left political praxis in India. It examines the narratives I collected by conducting interviews with activists and analysing some of the earliest fact-finding reports from the period. The most distinguishing characteristic, I argue, of the practice of fact-finding in this period was that it was a hybrid of liberal legalism and left politics. This practice was a unique strategy that was liberal legalist in its form while retaining an affinity with movements on the far left that denounced ‘bourgeois’ state and law.

Suggested Citation

  • Ankita Pandey, 2020. "Left turn to legalism: fact-finding inquiries as political critique in 1970s India," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 525-542, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:42:y:2020:i:3:p:525-542
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2020.1851595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2020.1851595
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2020.1851595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:42:y:2020:i:3:p:525-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.