IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v45y2024i1p21-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy punctuations and agenda diversity in China: a national level analysis from 1980 to 2019

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaolei Qin
  • Jing Huang

Abstract

Based on data sources systematically tracking government activity such as budgets and bill hearings, the Punctuated Equilibrium Theory literature has demonstrated that policy processes in both democracies and nondemocracies feature long periods of stasis interrupted by dramatic changes. However, there is a lack of research that systematically examines China’s policy process. In response, this article introduces a new dataset drawn from China State Council Gazettes from 1980 to 2019 to measure policy punctuations and agenda diversity in China. We find that punctuations in China’s policy process are more intense than those in democracies. The findings further show that China’s policy process features more positive punctuations than negative punctuations. We also find an overall increasing trend of agenda diversity and a pattern of alternation between agenda expansion and concentration across the forty years analyzed in this paper. These findings provide new long-term evidence regarding patterns of policy stability and change in the Chinese context and contribute to our understanding of China’s politics of attention and its linkage with information inefficiency and survival politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaolei Qin & Jing Huang, 2024. "Policy punctuations and agenda diversity in China: a national level analysis from 1980 to 2019," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 21-41, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:45:y:2024:i:1:p:21-41
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2023.2183944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2023.2183944
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2023.2183944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:45:y:2024:i:1:p:21-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.