IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v43y2022i5p1156-1171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do social media reduce compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures?

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Maria Pavelea
  • Bogdana Neamțu
  • Alexandru Pavel

Abstract

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, authorities had to take measures to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Since then, various vaccines have been developed. However, countries have not been equally successful in promoting these vaccines. Thus, preventive measures are still necessary in order to contain the COVID-19 virus. Nevertheless, compliance with preventive measures might be affected by the surge of disinformation on social media. Although various studies have examined the factors that predict this compliance, few studies have focused on Eastern European countries or have examined the role played by the types of sources used in gathering information about the pandemic. Thus, the present study investigated the effect the sources of information people use to have on compliance with preventive measures, while controlling for a large number of variables. The research focused on the Cluj metropolitan area, Romania, through a representative survey. The results show that reliance on social media has a negative effect on compliance, while reliance on specialized journals/websites has a positive effect, irrespective of the other factors controlled for. The results also highlight that in order to increase compliance authorities should communicate clearly and with empathy the risk the COVID-19 virus poses to society.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Maria Pavelea & Bogdana Neamțu & Alexandru Pavel, 2022. "Do social media reduce compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures?," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 1156-1171, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:43:y:2022:i:5:p:1156-1171
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2021.2000595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2021.2000595
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2021.2000595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:43:y:2022:i:5:p:1156-1171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.