IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v43y2022i5p1135-1155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing the quality of governance across the European Union member countries: a grey relational analysis approach

Author

Listed:
  • Deniz Koçak
  • Mehmet Akif Özer

Abstract

The concept of governance indicates a process that is associated with the forming of the rules and regulations by independent actors that can guide the countries to develop in political, social, and economic areas. Therefore, monitoring and ranking of the European Union (EU) member countries’ governance performance have great importance for policy-makers. Six main governance indicators are identified in the Worldwide Governance Indicators report conducted by the World Bank. The governance indicators enable us to answer questions such as which countries are being governed well or which countries are behind at governance. However, few studies examine the countries at the aggregated level of governance indicators. This article intends to fill this gap by providing a new framework (grey relational analysis) for analysing the governance quality of countries. The analysis covers the governance indicators data of the period from 2013 to 2020 of the EU-28 countries. Through this study enabled the evaluation of country performances in an internationally accepted normative framework, the performance changes of countries are explained over the years, and it is possible to analyse the progress made by the countries in detail at the point of good governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Deniz Koçak & Mehmet Akif Özer, 2022. "Comparing the quality of governance across the European Union member countries: a grey relational analysis approach," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(5), pages 1135-1155, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:43:y:2022:i:5:p:1135-1155
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2021.1994135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2021.1994135
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2021.1994135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:43:y:2022:i:5:p:1135-1155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.