IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v43y2022i2p183-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the predictors of medical marijuana legalization in the United States using an empirically based taxonomy approach

Author

Listed:
  • Gook Jin Kim

Abstract

The legalization of medical marijuana in states of the United States is currently a controversial topic. Despite conflict with the federal government, 33 states have legalized medical marijuana and other states are currently considering adopting the law by the year 2019. Why do some US states adopt medical marijuana laws (MMLs) and others do not? This study examines the diffusion of MMLs by analysing policy adoption from morality and economic development policy perspectives. This study finds that the morality perspectives of states – religious groups, citizens' liberal ideology, and a ballot initiative process – have a significant effect on the adoption of medical marijuana laws. Economic indicators – fiscal capacity growth, incarceration, and the cost of the justice system – also have a significant effect on adoption. Marijuana users and the state regulatory environment are also important predictors of the diffusion. Overall, this study finds that the adoption and diffusion of MMLs is mainly determined by the opinions of citizens rather than the political ideology of elected officials or the government’s fiscal health conditions. In addition, the study finds that the multidimensional policy model provides a better explanation for this than either of the single policy perspective models.

Suggested Citation

  • Gook Jin Kim, 2022. "Examining the predictors of medical marijuana legalization in the United States using an empirically based taxonomy approach," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 183-202, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:43:y:2022:i:2:p:183-202
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1656805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2019.1656805
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2019.1656805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:43:y:2022:i:2:p:183-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.