IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v41y2020i2-3p131-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restoring voting rights: evidence that reversing felony disenfranchisement increases political efficacy

Author

Listed:
  • Victoria Shineman

Abstract

Millions of American citizens are denied the right to vote due to their criminal record. This study finds evidence that restoring the right to vote causes formerly disenfranchised individuals to develop higher levels of internal and external efficacy, generating citizens who are more confident in their own abilities and have stronger tendencies toward democratic engagement. A field experiment is embedded within a panel survey conducted before and after a statewide election in Virginia. All subjects are American citizens with a felony conviction who were once disenfranchised, but are now either eligible to vote, or are eligible to have their voting rights restored. Experimental treatments provide information about recent changes in restored voting rights, along with varying information and assistance with voter registration and turnout. The treatment that included a mobilization element generated the highest levels of efficacy. Additionally, the treatment that only included information about restoring voting rights also generated significant increases in political efficacy on its own. Thus the study finds novel evidence that the right to vote directly increases political efficacy.

Suggested Citation

  • Victoria Shineman, 2020. "Restoring voting rights: evidence that reversing felony disenfranchisement increases political efficacy," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2-3), pages 131-150, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:41:y:2020:i:2-3:p:131-150
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2019.1694655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2019.1694655
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2019.1694655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:41:y:2020:i:2-3:p:131-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.