IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v40y2019i3-4p260-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studying policy advisory systems: beyond the Westminster-bias?

Author

Listed:
  • Thurid Hustedt

Abstract

Research on policy advisory systems has rapidly proliferated over the last decade and now focuses on advisory system change dynamics. Yet, empirical studies predominantly focus on the study of policy advisory systems in Westminster systems and it is those studies upon which theorization relies. This paper argues that this Westminster-prevalence resulted in a Westminster-bias of our understanding of policy advisory systems and directs attention to more abstract or general analytical dimensions that may be relevant for the comparative study of policy advisory systems and research on advice systems in transitional and developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Thurid Hustedt, 2019. "Studying policy advisory systems: beyond the Westminster-bias?," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3-4), pages 260-269, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:40:y:2019:i:3-4:p:260-269
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2018.1557627
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2018.1557627
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2018.1557627?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caner Bakir, 2023. "The vicious circle of policy advisory systems and knowledge regimes in consolidated authoritarian regimes," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 42(3), pages 419-439.
    2. Bach Tobias & Meyer-Sahling Jan-Hinrik & Staroňová Katarína, 2020. "Top officials in Turbulent Times: Converging Research Agendas in Europe East and West," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 25-34, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:40:y:2019:i:3-4:p:260-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.