IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cposxx/v38y2017i1p59-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-crisis learning in public agencies: what do we learn from both actors and institutions?

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Schiffino
  • Laurent Taskin
  • Céline Donis
  • Julien Raone

Abstract

Post-crisis learning is a challenge for public organizations, and especially for agencies which handle health and environmental risks. This article investigates how the Belgian Food Safety Agency settles mechanisms for drawing lessons from crises while ensuring day-to-day routine. The framework by Crozier and Friedberg is used as a guideline to consider both the actors and the system, both strategic games and institutional constraints. The article helps in understanding the institutional logics underpinning how the public organizations learn from societal risk and crisis. Centralization and openness appear to be guiding principles, resulting from the learning games. They also generate tensions that the actors’ games manage by defining new rules for cooperation. Both the practice (through our case study) and the theory (combining actors and institutions) broaden the lens of policy analysis for what policy-making at organizational level concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Schiffino & Laurent Taskin & Céline Donis & Julien Raone, 2017. "Post-crisis learning in public agencies: what do we learn from both actors and institutions?," Policy Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 59-75, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:38:y:2017:i:1:p:59-75
    DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2016.1188906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01442872.2016.1188906
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01442872.2016.1188906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cposxx:v:38:y:2017:i:1:p:59-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cpos .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.