Diagnosing the strategic health of an organization from SWOT analysis results: case study of the Australasian cost management profession
AbstractTo achieve strategic goals and success in the long term, every organization needs to be in a good state of health. It is argued that the strategic health of an organization depends on how the key strengths are leveraged to exploit prime opportunities, while at the same time, minimize exposure of the critical weaknesses to the serious threats in the external environment. Based on a SWOT analysis (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats), the Strategic Health Index (SHI) was developed as a conceptual tool for diagnosing the strategic health of an organization. Application of the developed model was demonstrated in the assessment of the strategic health status of the Australasian cost management profession using analysed feedback from a convenience sample of 15 senior cost managers in Australia and New Zealand. Results show that expertise in procurement and cost consultancy was the key strength most leveraged to exploit identified opportunities, while lack of flexibility and versatility of service was the key weakness exposing the profession the most to the identified threats. Based on the SHI values, the overall strategic health of the cost management profession was diagnosed to be positive, in spite of its key weaknesses and threats. While these results specifically relate to cost managers, application of the model is highly recommended for use by business managers and others interested in assessing the long-term health and survival of their organizations.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Construction Management and Economics.
Volume (Year): 29 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCME20
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.