IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/comdev/v52y2021i1p42-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community responses to biosecurity regulations during a biosecurity outbreak: An Auckland, New Zealand Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rajesh Ram

Abstract

The destructive Queensland fruit fly (QFF), known to attack export varieties of New Zealand grown primary horticultural produce was discovered in February 2015 in the suburb of Grey Lynn, Auckland, New Zealand, resulting in a biosecurity crisis. Invasion ecology theory was used to understand measures put in place by the authorities in the community to control its spread. Community members in the fruit fly affected area were invited to take part in research. Seven different questions related to the QFF and wider environmental issues were the focus during interviews. Results showed that although the community cooperated with the authorities by following strict guidelines such as restricting the movement of QFF host material. Loss of privacy, a lack of information about the QFF and unfamiliarity with the term biosecurity were some issues reported by the community. Education, coupled with effective marketing about biosecurity, may increase community involvement in the biosecurity cause.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajesh Ram, 2021. "Community responses to biosecurity regulations during a biosecurity outbreak: An Auckland, New Zealand Case Study," Community Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(1), pages 42-60, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:52:y:2021:i:1:p:42-60
    DOI: 10.1080/15575330.2020.1831564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/15575330.2020.1831564
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/15575330.2020.1831564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:comdev:v:52:y:2021:i:1:p:42-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RCOD20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.