IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjudxx/v26y2021i5p630-650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Democratizing design: possibilities for Detroit’s community benefits ordinance

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Berglund

Abstract

The scholarship on participatory design has indicated continued struggles to develop processes that genuinely include citizen feedback in an inclusive manner. This paper explores whether Detroit’s Community Benefits Ordinance, that has allowed for residents to negotiate community benefits like parks, public spaces and streetscape improvements is a possible avenue for improved participatory design. This research shows that the Ordinance allowed for citizens to negotiate benefits related to the built environment, accounting for about one third of benefits won. However, there are significant barriers towards the Ordinance providing a transparent, non-elitist, and non-tokenistic environment for citizen participation in urban design.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Berglund, 2021. "Democratizing design: possibilities for Detroit’s community benefits ordinance," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(5), pages 630-650, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:26:y:2021:i:5:p:630-650
    DOI: 10.1080/13574809.2021.1917985
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13574809.2021.1917985
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13574809.2021.1917985?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjudxx:v:26:y:2021:i:5:p:630-650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjud20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.