IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjsbxx/v23y2021i3p502-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Unbridgeable Gulf: Applying Bennett’s Model of Analysis to the 2017 Gulf Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Majed Mohammed Hassan Al-Ansari

Abstract

While the Gulf States have been involved in several conflicts since the formation of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) in 1981, the recent crisis between Qatar and the self-proclaimed, Saudi-led ‘Quartet’ nations (Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and Egypt) has been the most severe internal conflict among the Gulf States for decades. The aim of this paper is to provide an in-depth analysis of the nature, causes, and future of the intra-Gulf conflict through the lens of the nearly four-year blockade of Qatar. The paper appropriates a model of analysis developed by William Bennett in order to assess inter-state conflict in the Arabian Gulf region. Using Bennett’s model, this paper explains how the blockade of Qatar is a product of Saudi Arabia’s hegemonic ambitions. As Bennett’s model argues that political conflicts result from the perpetual imbalance of supply and demand of resources, thus proving that political conflicts are insoluble, regional hegemony is identified as the defining political resource perpetuating conflict between Qatar and Saudi Arabia. As the Al-Ula agreement signed in January 2021 did not fully resolve the roots of this fight for hegemony, this is only a temporary solution to the conflict between Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

Suggested Citation

  • Majed Mohammed Hassan Al-Ansari, 2021. "The Unbridgeable Gulf: Applying Bennett’s Model of Analysis to the 2017 Gulf Crisis," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 502-515, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:23:y:2021:i:3:p:502-515
    DOI: 10.1080/19448953.2021.1888252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19448953.2021.1888252
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19448953.2021.1888252?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:23:y:2021:i:3:p:502-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjsb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.