IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cjsbxx/v23y2021i2p358-377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rejecting the Neoliberal Balkan Land Grab Hypothesis: The Absence of the EU’s Transformative Power in Land Use Governance in Bosnia and Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Sean Parramore
  • Jonathan Webb

Abstract

Amidst doubts that it still has transformative power to drive institutional change in the Balkans, structuralists claim that the ‘neoliberal’ European Union (EU) helps enable ‘land grabbing’ by driving the region to liberalize land governing institutions. Based on our field research in urban contexts we reject this supposed causal relationship. We examined the processes that enabled two recent high-stakes land deals in the capitals of Serbia and Bosnia–Herzegovina, both Balkan countries seeking EU accession. Using the Institutional Analysis and Development framework, we find the EU’s transformative power absent in both cases. Instead, we observe national and local elites opaquely facilitating hand-picked investments and cooperating to change urban land-use rules. We thus argue that endogenous drivers, like the possibility of expanding rent-seeking in situations of unequal information access, better explain the Balkan land deal phenomenon; and that the generalization that the ‘neoliberal’ EU helps drive land grabbing needs serious reconsideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Sean Parramore & Jonathan Webb, 2021. "Rejecting the Neoliberal Balkan Land Grab Hypothesis: The Absence of the EU’s Transformative Power in Land Use Governance in Bosnia and Serbia," Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 358-377, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:23:y:2021:i:2:p:358-377
    DOI: 10.1080/19448953.2020.1867804
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/19448953.2020.1867804
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/19448953.2020.1867804?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cjsbxx:v:23:y:2021:i:2:p:358-377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cjsb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.