IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v26y2022i1p128-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowd control

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Ashton
  • Rachel Weber

Abstract

We examine the rise of crowdfunding platforms in the wake of the global financial crisis, particularly the claim that they offer an alternative to established methods of raising capital for real estate investment, enterprise development, and civic projects. We interrogate how these novel methods of aggregating users and their money in digital space produce different collective subjectivities. Drawing from an industry study of civic crowdfunding portals in the United States and legal research into the regulatory apparatus governing them, we put forth a two-part typology to help make sense of the varied business models of crowdfunding platforms and the ways in which those models invoke and harness crowds as concrete social formations. The first distinguishes crowdfunding platforms based on what is being circulated—the substance of the payment and the economic relations it embodies and creates. The second focuses on the legal dimension of these relations, both within the transaction and in the way sites constitute the crowd through the inherited financial-regulatory vocabularies governing the issuance of securities.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Ashton & Rachel Weber, 2022. "Crowd control," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 128-141, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:26:y:2022:i:1:p:128-141
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2021.2018852
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2021.2018852
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2021.2018852?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:26:y:2022:i:1:p:128-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.