IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v24y2020i3-4p656-667.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-fallism

Author

Listed:
  • Mirjana Ristic

Abstract

This paper explores the afterlife of the fallen Lenin Monument, which once stood since 1970 on the Leninplatz in the former East Berlin. In 1991, the monument was dismantled into 129 pieces and buried under a sand hill in a forest in Müggelheim, in the far south-east of Berlin. In 2015, its head was dug out and displayed in Berlin’s Spandau Citadel at the permanent exhibition showing the city’s fallen monuments from Prussian times to today. This paper analyses architectural, urban and political effects of the re-emergence of the Lenin Monument head. It does so by looking at the debates surrounding its restoration; its form and disposition within the spatial setting of the exhibition, its encounter by and interaction with the public and its meanings. The analysis is based on the site observation and participant observation of the statue’s head within the exhibition and discourse analysis of its representation in the exhibition materials and in media. The argument is that the re-emerged part of the Lenin Monument forms a ‘counter-monument’ that challenges the political roles of both the original and the fallen monument. It contests the notion of the monument as an icon of political authority, which was the purpose of the original Lenin Monument. It also represents a way of coming to terms with the past that enables the public to critically engage with the legacy of the past authoritarian regime in contrast to the fall of the Lenin Monument, which was a means of suppressing it.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirjana Ristic, 2020. "Post-fallism," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3-4), pages 656-667, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:24:y:2020:i:3-4:p:656-667
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2020.1784595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2020.1784595
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2020.1784595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:24:y:2020:i:3-4:p:656-667. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.