IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v24y2020i3-4p594-604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Iconoclasm and response on Dublin’s Sackville/O’Connell Street, 1759–2003

Author

Listed:
  • Derek N. Boetcher

Abstract

The residents of Dublin, Ireland have developed a robust commemorative infrastructure throughout the city since the early eighteenth century. A prominent site in this landscape is at the centre of O’Connell Street (Sackville Street from the late 1700s to 1924). Today, the Spire of Dublin (2003) is located at this site. But it projects an ambiguous connection to both the city’s and the country’s factious history. Two other statues previously stood on the site, both commemorating British imperial military figures: the Blakeney Monument (1759) and Nelson’s Pillar (1808). Both works were intentionally destroyed in acts of urban iconoclasm. An analysis of the changes in the monumental public art on this site over the centuries demonstrates that iconoclasm has been a factor in shifting Irish attitudes toward the British and themselves, Irish associations with power and memory, and a potent symbol in Dublin’s urban landscape. This is established by using an expanded conceptualisation of iconoclasm that incorporates a series of post-fall responses to a monument and its site’s physical state and context over time, the site’s continued symbolic meanings, and the site becoming home to new monumental or other symbolic expressions. The result illustrates that this site has been significantly inscribed into British imperial and Irish national iconography regardless of the monument or public sculpture it has held.

Suggested Citation

  • Derek N. Boetcher, 2020. "Iconoclasm and response on Dublin’s Sackville/O’Connell Street, 1759–2003," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3-4), pages 594-604, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:24:y:2020:i:3-4:p:594-604
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2020.1784582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2020.1784582
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2020.1784582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:24:y:2020:i:3-4:p:594-604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.