IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v22y2018i2p270-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial responsibilities during informal public events

Author

Listed:
  • Riina Lundman

Abstract

This article focuses on the question of responsibility with regard to organizing informal events in urban public spaces. The concept of responsibility is analyzed from a spatial perspective by asking what kind of responsibilities people have for the shared spaces of the city, and for the others with which they share those spaces. This article provides an empirical case study of a protest-festival (protestival) called Art Slum (Taideslummi), which was organized annually in the city of Turku, Finland, between 2007 and 2013. By organizing an event in a public park, the local activists aimed to provoke discussions about the usage of public spaces in the city. However, in 2011, Art Slum was evicted from the park by the police and city authorities because of suspected acts of vandalism and disorder. This article examines different kinds of juridical, ethical, and practical aspects of responsibility related to Art Slum, concentrating especially on the anarchist ethics and practices behind the event. It is suggested that responsibility for the city can be perceived either as a restrictive, constructive, or subversive practice, depending on how it affects the ‘publicness’ of an urban space. This article argues that all these three forms of spatial responsibility are needed if the aim is to accomplish public spaces that are simultaneously accessible and political.

Suggested Citation

  • Riina Lundman, 2018. "Spatial responsibilities during informal public events," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 270-284, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:22:y:2018:i:2:p:270-284
    DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2018.1451139
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13604813.2018.1451139
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13604813.2018.1451139?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:22:y:2018:i:2:p:270-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.