IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cipsxx/v22y2017i3p289-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Taking responsibility for ‘shared responsibility’: urban planning for disaster risk reduction across different phases. Examining bushfire evacuation in Victoria, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Jorge León
  • Alan March

Abstract

Urban planning has been increasingly recognized as a key mechanism for disaster risk reduction. Nevertheless, it has been difficult to translate this recognition into appropriate urban morphologies. Challenges still exist in working across the different phases involved in disaster management and in supporting the ongoing shift from top-down to shared responsibility risk reduction approaches. This paper examines these issues in the context of a bushfire emergency affecting three urban fringe communities in Bendigo, Victoria. The response activity of evacuation is studied with a computer agent-based model, demonstrating that: (1) complete evacuations take considerable time (30 min to 1 h); (2) urban form characteristics can have a noticeable impact on augmenting or decreasing this time and (3) it is possible for bushfires to overrun or surround settlements before this time. Existing ‘leave early’ policy is confirmed as appropriate, but further examination of the role of urban morphology during a bushfire disaster is required.

Suggested Citation

  • Jorge León & Alan March, 2017. "Taking responsibility for ‘shared responsibility’: urban planning for disaster risk reduction across different phases. Examining bushfire evacuation in Victoria, Australia," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 289-304, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:22:y:2017:i:3:p:289-304
    DOI: 10.1080/13563475.2016.1234368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13563475.2016.1234368
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13563475.2016.1234368?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cipsxx:v:22:y:2017:i:3:p:289-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cips20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.