IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/chosxx/v28y2013i1p95-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Tenure Mix Interventions: A Case Study from Sydney, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Lucy Elizabeth Groenhart

Abstract

Policies of tenure mix, by removing concentrations of social housing or through the application of inclusionary zoning-type powers to new developments, are being pursued throughout Australia and in the USA, the UK and New Zealand. Implementing this tenure mix policy agenda requires significant intervention into urban areas that currently have concentrations of social housing, through programmes of regeneration or renewal. Despite this policy agenda, research on the benefits of tenure mix has produced inconclusive evidence, both in Australia and internationally. The paper reports on research undertaken in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, which tests a method of evaluating tenure mix policy. The exploratory method uses dwelling price data as a proxy for measuring amenity or 'neighbourhood quality' changes from tenure mix interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucy Elizabeth Groenhart, 2013. "Evaluating Tenure Mix Interventions: A Case Study from Sydney, Australia," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 95-115, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:28:y:2013:i:1:p:95-115
    DOI: 10.1080/02673037.2013.729268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02673037.2013.729268
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02673037.2013.729268?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:chosxx:v:28:y:2013:i:1:p:95-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/chos20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.