IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v33y2023i3p291-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Six principles to strengthen qualitative assessments in development interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Jess MacArthur
  • Rana Abdel Sattar
  • Naomi Carrard
  • Tyler Kozole
  • Chris Nicoletti
  • Lauren Riley
  • Jennifer Roglà
  • Veasna Toeur
  • Juliet Willetts

Abstract

Qualitative research and evaluation is often described as an art rather than a science. This intangible nature has left many program teams feeling uncertain about how to justify and use qualitative forms of assessment in their monitoring, evaluation, and learning practice. Existing guidance is theoretically based and often focused on applications in the Global North. Building on an expressed need for guidance from a community of practice in Asia and the Pacific, this collaborative action research process aimed to create practical and tested guidance for program teams. The analysis was conducted as part of a Cambodia-based sanitation program assessment. Drawing from literature and the collaborative process, we propose a set of six principles to guide insightful, practical, and robust qualitative assessments. We provide examples regarding how the principles can be used to plan, conduct, and review qualitative assessments with a goal to strengthen the future use of qualitative tools in programming.

Suggested Citation

  • Jess MacArthur & Rana Abdel Sattar & Naomi Carrard & Tyler Kozole & Chris Nicoletti & Lauren Riley & Jennifer Roglà & Veasna Toeur & Juliet Willetts, 2023. "Six principles to strengthen qualitative assessments in development interventions," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 291-300, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:33:y:2023:i:3:p:291-300
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2022.2065245
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2022.2065245
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2022.2065245?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:33:y:2023:i:3:p:291-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.