IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v31y2021i6p739-750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A whole-of-government review to a whole-of-government response: a narrative review of the United States Government’s 2013–2016 West Africa Ebola Epidemic post-operation reports

Author

Listed:
  • Megan Rhodes
  • Samuel Boland

Abstract

The 2013–2016 West Africa Ebola Epidemic was and remains the world’s largest outbreak of Ebola Virus Disease. The United States Government (USG) spent $2.7 billion responding to the outbreak, predominantly through the deployment of the US Agency for International Development, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Department of Defense. Each of these USG agencies, as well as several others, wrote substantive post-operation reports, including myriad recommendations for how to improve interdepartmental coordination and collaboration during future disease outbreak responses. However, to date, no effort has been made to compare and contrast these post-operation reports and their respective recommendations, with a view to finding synergies between them. This essay evaluates the various reports in the public domain, and finds that four areas are consistently referenced: the need to clarify roles and responsibilities between USG agencies, reinforce data sharing and surveillance, perform joint planning, and improve communication and coordination with external partners. These four areas therefore represent high-priority policy interventions for ensuring the efficacy and efficiency of the USG’s future interventions in response to critical public health threats.

Suggested Citation

  • Megan Rhodes & Samuel Boland, 2021. "A whole-of-government review to a whole-of-government response: a narrative review of the United States Government’s 2013–2016 West Africa Ebola Epidemic post-operation reports," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 739-750, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:31:y:2021:i:6:p:739-750
    DOI: 10.1080/09614524.2021.1907540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09614524.2021.1907540
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09614524.2021.1907540?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:31:y:2021:i:6:p:739-750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.