IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v31y2023i3p585-605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Women’s Complaint: sociolegal mobilization against authoritarian backsliding following the 2020 abortion law in Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Kubal

Abstract

The decision of the Constitutional Tribunal in October 2020 has severely curtailed women’s reproductive rights in Poland. Mass protests ensued. This article focuses on the untold story of a productive rupture that channelled the protesters’ efforts into a mass legal mobilization against the tribunal’s judgement to the European Court of Human Rights. These applications, known as the “Women’s Complaint,” were filed by over one thousand Polish women. Triangulating between analysis of interviews with human rights lawyers and feminist activists, and the legal reasoning of the petition, this article’s original contribution traces the evolution of the Women’s Complaint from a reproductive rights dispute to a challenge to the government’s authoritarian backsliding to better understand the relationship between social conflicts and legal mobilization. Reproductive rights and democratic values are inextricable; threats to one reinforce threats to the other. The Women’s Complaint is about women standing up for their reproductive rights and – in effect – spearheading a much broader rights-based litigation against authoritarianism.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Kubal, 2023. "The Women’s Complaint: sociolegal mobilization against authoritarian backsliding following the 2020 abortion law in Poland," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 585-605, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:31:y:2023:i:3:p:585-605
    DOI: 10.1080/25739638.2023.2258609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/25739638.2023.2258609
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/25739638.2023.2258609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:31:y:2023:i:3:p:585-605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.