IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdebxx/v20y2012i1p3-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining Undeclared Wage Payments by Employers in Central and Eastern Europe: A Critique of the Neo-liberal De-regulatory Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Colin Williams

Abstract

The aim of this article is to evaluate critically the neo-liberal de-regulatory theory which asserts that the way to tackle undeclared work is to de-regulate economies and cut-back welfare provision. Reporting the results of a 2007 Eurobarometer survey of envelope wages in 10 Central and Eastern European countries, the finding is that the practice of formal employees receiving two wages from their formal employer, an official declared salary and an additional undeclared wage, markedly varies cross-nationally, from 23% of formal employees in Romania to just 3% of formal employees in the Czech Republic. Analyzing this from a “varieties of capitalism” perspective, undeclared envelope wage payments are found to be more prevalent in neo-liberal economies with lower levels of state intervention and less common in more “welfare capitalist” economies in which there is greater state intervention in work and welfare. The resultant conclusion is that envelope wages are correlated with the under- rather than over-regulation of work and welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin Williams, 2012. "Explaining Undeclared Wage Payments by Employers in Central and Eastern Europe: A Critique of the Neo-liberal De-regulatory Theory," Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 3-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:20:y:2012:i:1:p:3-20
    DOI: 10.1080/0965156X.2012.718570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0965156X.2012.718570
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0965156X.2012.718570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdebxx:v:20:y:2012:i:1:p:3-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdeb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.