IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ccasxx/v39y2020i3p398-419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Silent partners: archaeological insights on mobility, interaction and civilization in Central Asia’s past

Author

Listed:
  • Lynne M. Rouse

Abstract

Civilizations are as complex as the human relationships that engendered them, and outlining these relational qualities within open notions of mobility and interaction frames a reconceptualization of Central Asia’s past. Recent Eurasian archaeological research deconstructs deterministic political-economic or hierarchical typologies of civilization and the overly simplified narrative that roots it in urban centres perpetually juxtaposed with nomadic groups. Archaeological evidence from the Oxus Civilization, Central Asia’s earliest complex polity (ca. 2500–1400 BCE), reveals the deep roots of sedentary–mobile interactions. I argue that Oxus–steppe relationships helped maintain the long-term structural cohesion of the Oxus Civilization as a multicultural entity, with implications for subsequent Central Asian polities. As we begin to balance the lopsided conversations about the social formations of Central Asia’s past and present, the silent partnership that characterized the Oxus Civilization is given a voice that forces us to reconsider who, exactly, belongs inside our notions of civilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynne M. Rouse, 2020. "Silent partners: archaeological insights on mobility, interaction and civilization in Central Asia’s past," Central Asian Survey, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 398-419, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:39:y:2020:i:3:p:398-419
    DOI: 10.1080/02634937.2020.1769024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02634937.2020.1769024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02634937.2020.1769024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ccasxx:v:39:y:2020:i:3:p:398-419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ccas .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.