IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/bushst/v65y2023i8p1417-1437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When GM met Austin: British and American variants of inter-war automobile mass production

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Scott

Abstract

Fordist automobile production methods are regarded as having been viable only in the USA prior to the 1950s. This article examines their potential in the largest non-North American automobile market—the UK, using recently-released documentation regarding General Motors’ (GM’s) abortive 1925 takeover bid for Britain’s second largest car manufacturer, the Austin Motor Company. GM’s plans for developing Austin as the leading UK car manufacturer show that existing British mass production methods could have yielded substantially higher productivity, when combined with American systems for achieving ‘economies of throughput’. This, in turn, required tacit knowledge regarding ‘flow production’ methods, which GM executives identified as the missing element of Austin’s ‘elementary mass production’ system. The article also discusses GM’s detailed plans for Austin—utilising economies of scale, scope, and throughput to reduce prices to levels competitors would find hard to match—and their implications for the British automobile industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Scott, 2023. "When GM met Austin: British and American variants of inter-war automobile mass production," Business History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(8), pages 1417-1437, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:65:y:2023:i:8:p:1417-1437
    DOI: 10.1080/00076791.2021.1979519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00076791.2021.1979519
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00076791.2021.1979519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:bushst:v:65:y:2023:i:8:p:1417-1437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FBSH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.