IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v56y2024i10p1109-1118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vine copula Granger causality in quantiles

Author

Listed:
  • Hyuna Jang
  • Jong-Min Kim
  • Hohsuk Noh

Abstract

Causal relationships between time series are typically examined by testing for Granger causality. Although many studies have tested Granger causality in mean, non-causality in mean does not need to carry over to other distribution characteristics or different parts of the distribution. This scenario has motivated many researchers to investigate causal relations from the perspective of conditional quantiles. Several methods have been proposed for both parametric and nonparametric modelling frameworks. Parametric methods have limitations in detecting nonlinear causality, whereas nonparametric methods have difficulty selecting smoothing parameters that significantly affect detection performance. To overcome the difficulties of both parametric and nonparametric Granger causality tests in quantiles, we propose a vine copula Granger causality test in quantiles using the semiparametric time-series modelling technique. The proposed test overcomes shortcomings in parametric modelling and has a computational advantage over nonparametric tests. Our test shows good performance in terms of size and power when using various simulated data. Finally, we illustrate our test using recent cryptocurrency data.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyuna Jang & Jong-Min Kim & Hohsuk Noh, 2024. "Vine copula Granger causality in quantiles," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(10), pages 1109-1118, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:10:p:1109-1118
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2174941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2174941
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2174941?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:56:y:2024:i:10:p:1109-1118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.