IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i54p6391-6409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Productive managers, productive branches, and the rewards. Evidence from the cooperative banks in Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Arandarage Mayura Prasad Arandara
  • Shingo Takahashi

Abstract

Using branch-manager linked data from the Cooperative Rural Banks (CRBs) of Sri Lanka, we investigate the source of branch performance differences. Despite the significant variation in the local conditions of branches, we found that managerial talent matters significantly. Manager effects explain 35% of the raw variation in the branch profit per worker and 45% of the raw variation in the branch-level non-performing loan ratio (NPLR). Branch effects explain a larger share of the variations in branch profit per worker (69%), but explain a smaller share of variation for NPLR (41%). We did not find evidence that branch managers are rewarded for their real contributions, measured by the estimated manager effects, via salary increase. Rather, they are rewarded merely for the raw performance of their branches. However, managers are rewarded with improved branch assignments when they increase profit-per-worker. A one standard deviation improvement in manager effects would increase the probability of being assigned to the top quartile branches by 8.7%.

Suggested Citation

  • Arandarage Mayura Prasad Arandara & Shingo Takahashi, 2023. "Productive managers, productive branches, and the rewards. Evidence from the cooperative banks in Sri Lanka," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(54), pages 6391-6409, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:54:p:6391-6409
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2155609
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2155609
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2155609?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:54:p:6391-6409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.