IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i50p5925-5938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Education and happiness: does education expenditure undermine households’ subjective well-being? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Yongyi Zhu
  • Di Yu

Abstract

Education expenditure accounts for a rising proportion of household income and gradually becomes a burden on households. Few studies have analysed whether the household’s subjective well-being (SWB) decreases under these conditions. To fill the gap, we explore the nexus between education expenditure and the SWB of households, using China Household Finance Survey data. The results confirm that education expenditure significantly attenuates the SWB of Chinese households. Moreover, empirical results suggest that the ‘arms race’ in education investment, the crowding out effect on other household consumption, and the synergy effect on family liabilities are three channels for education expenditure’s adverse effects on SWB. Further analysis shows that this expenditure’s detrimental impacts are more significant in provinces with high Gaokao pressure and the middle-income class, indicating that Gaokao pressure is the main driving force for the education arms race in China and that middle-class families are the most likely to be involved and be injured in the education arms race. Our findings confirm that the ‘double reduction’ regulation is necessary, and relevant policies require improvement to promote equality in education and achieve higher life satisfaction for people across China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yongyi Zhu & Di Yu, 2023. "Education and happiness: does education expenditure undermine households’ subjective well-being? Evidence from China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(50), pages 5925-5938, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:50:p:5925-5938
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2140772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2140772
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2140772?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:50:p:5925-5938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.