IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i47p5504-5517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The influences of peers on outpatient physicians’ diagnostic scan decision-making

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxiang Sheng
  • Chengyuan Wang
  • Jun Li

Abstract

Outpatient physicians’ diagnostic scan decision-making is not only related to the quality of medical diagnosis but also connected with the operations efficiency of the hospital. Identifying and understanding how outpatient physicians react to their peers in diagnostic scan decisions is an important economics issue that can help hospitals improve their operations effectiveness. Based on the data collected from a Chinese 3A Grade hospital, we reveal that peers have negative influences on outpatient physicians in deciding the number of scan orders during a shift. Relative to male physicians, female physicians are more likely to be influenced by their peers. Moreover, physicians in the surgical medicine departments are more sensitive to peers regarding decisions on scan orders, relative to those in the internal medicine departments. We further find that several conventional social interaction factors, including learning, status, and homophily, do not act on peer influence. While resource spillover caused by shared scan resource constraints, patient-volume and physician-volume can enlarge the negative peer influence, suggesting that resource spillover should be a significant driving force of the peer influence in deciding the number of scan orders. Finally, theoretical and management implications are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxiang Sheng & Chengyuan Wang & Jun Li, 2023. "The influences of peers on outpatient physicians’ diagnostic scan decision-making," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(47), pages 5504-5517, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:47:p:5504-5517
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2022.2140109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2022.2140109
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2022.2140109?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:47:p:5504-5517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.