IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v55y2023i40p4712-4726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the efficacy of visual contracts: an empirical study of transaction costs

Author

Listed:
  • Bingyan Zan
  • Camilla Baasch Andersen
  • Lisa Toohey

Abstract

Visual contracts have attracted increasing attention as a human-focused approach to contract law, with proponents arguing they are a better way to effectively communicate complex terms and conditions. However, there have been only limited empirical studies of the efficacy of these contracts. This paper compares and evaluates data of responses to text and visual contracts from two large Australian companies. Drawing on theories of transaction cost economics, we undertook an empirical study of ordinary least square (OLS) regressions to examine the effectiveness of visual contracts in comparison with traditional text-based contracts. Analysis of the results demonstrates that the visual format plays a significant role in reducing the transaction costs of contracting, providing empirical confirmation of the value of contract redesign and the visual format.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingyan Zan & Camilla Baasch Andersen & Lisa Toohey, 2023. "Assessing the efficacy of visual contracts: an empirical study of transaction costs," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(40), pages 4712-4726, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:40:p:4712-4726
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2023.2174942
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2023.2174942
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2023.2174942?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:55:y:2023:i:40:p:4712-4726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.