IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v54y2022i9p974-995.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Merton model’s prediction and empirical evidence on bond and equity prices reaction to new bond issues

Author

Listed:
  • Fan Chen

Abstract

I use the Merton model as a theoretical framework to assess 1) the expected impact of a new bond offering on existing bond and stock prices, and 2) how the bond and stock price reactions are conditioned on characteristics of the new and existing bonds and the planned use of the new funds. Consistent with the Merton model prediction, I find negative and significant average abnormal returns of issuers’ existing bonds over a three-day event window surrounding the announcement of new bond issues. In contrast, average abnormal stock returns of the issuing firms are positive but insignificant. Bond market announcement returns estimated using daily corporate bond data from TRACE are more negative for longer-term outstanding bonds and less negative when the new bonds are junior to existing bonds. I also find that the bond price reaction (stock price reaction) is more negative (less positive) when funds are to be used for expansion than when they are to be used to repurchase stock.

Suggested Citation

  • Fan Chen, 2022. "Merton model’s prediction and empirical evidence on bond and equity prices reaction to new bond issues," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 974-995, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:54:y:2022:i:9:p:974-995
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2020.1861205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2020.1861205
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2020.1861205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:54:y:2022:i:9:p:974-995. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.