IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/applec/v52y2020i28p3035-3054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ability grouping and children’s non-cognitive outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Emily McDool

Abstract

The value of ability grouping is often debated despite being adopted in primary and secondary schools across the UK for the past 80 years. Setting is one form of ability grouping which is widely implemented in English schools; it involves dividing pupils from the same cohort into classes according to ability in a specific subject. While the existing evidence identifies a negative effect on cognitive outcomes, especially for low-ability pupils, little research has been undertaken to understand the impact of setting on non-cognitive outcomes. This paper provides the first evidence of the effect of setting on non-cognitive outcomes when utilizing a nationally representative sample of primary-aged pupils and adopting fixed effects and instrumental variable methodologies. For boys, setting in maths negatively impacts non-cognitive outcomes, driven by a worsening of internalizing behaviours. No evidence of a significant impact of lowest set placement on non-cognitive outcomes is identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily McDool, 2020. "Ability grouping and children’s non-cognitive outcomes," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(28), pages 3035-3054, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:28:p:3035-3054
    DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2019.1705239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00036846.2019.1705239
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00036846.2019.1705239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:applec:v:52:y:2020:i:28:p:3035-3054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEC20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.