IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v9y2002i13p889-892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of the pollution cost internalization on Taiwan's hog industry

Author

Listed:
  • Tai-Yung Kam
  • Jwu-Rong Lin

Abstract

Duality theory is utilized to develop a translog profit function (TPF) which includes one output (hog), three variable inputs (labour, fodder, and piglet), four fixed inputs (capital, farm size, location, and pollution cost). Based on the trade theory for small country, the factors of corn and soybean imports are introduced into the TPF model to examine the effects of pollution cost internalization on Taiwan's hog supply, input demand, and cereal imports, respectively. Through the analysis of output supply and input demand elasticities, the empirical results show that hog supply decreases 1.60%. The demands for labour, fodder, and piglets decrease 4.18%, 1.44%, and 1.3Percnt;, respectively. The decrease in fodder demanded leads the importation of corn and soybean to decrease 1.58% and 1.43%, respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Tai-Yung Kam & Jwu-Rong Lin, 2002. "The effects of the pollution cost internalization on Taiwan's hog industry," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(13), pages 889-892.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:9:y:2002:i:13:p:889-892
    DOI: 10.1080/13504850210159006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/13504850210159006&magic=repec&7C&7C8674ECAB8BB840C6AD35DC6213A474B5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504850210159006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramon E. Lopez, 1984. "Estimating Substitution and Expansion Effects Using a Profit Function Framework," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(3), pages 358-367.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frank Asche & Subal C. Kumbhakar & Ragnar Tveterås, 2007. "Testing cost vs. profit function," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(10), pages 715-718.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shoemaker, Robbin, 1986. "Effects of Changes in U.S. Agricultural Production on Demand for Farm Inputs," Technical Bulletins 157024, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Nehring, Richard F., 1991. "Output and Input Subsidy Policy Options in Bangladesh," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 43(2), pages 1-13.
    3. Chambers, Robert G., 1989. "The Simple Analytics of Nonjoint Production Relations," Working Papers 197621, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Hess, Sebastian & Surry, Yves R., 2011. "The CDET Profit Function: Could it generate a Parsimonious Agricultural Sector Model?," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114539, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Wall, Charles A. & Fisher, Brian S., 1988. "Supply Response and the Theory of Production and Profit Functions," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(03), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Fulginiti, Lilyan E. & Perrin, Richard K., 1987. "Argentine Agricultural Structure and Policy Implications," 1989 Occasional Paper Series No. 5 197659, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Christopher Klein & Reuben Kyle & J. Bass, 2004. "A Switching Regime Approach to Measuring the Effects of Technological Change in Ocean Shipping," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 29-49, July.
    8. Poison, Rudolph A. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1990. "Structure of South Central Agricultural Production," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(2), pages 153-163, December.
    9. Giancarlo Moschini, 1988. "A Model of Production with Supply Management for the Canadian Agricultural Sector," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 70(2), pages 318-329.
    10. Msangi, Siwa & Rosegrant, Mark, 2007. "A Closer Look at the IMPACT of Climate Change on Country-Level Food Security and Nutrition," Conference papers 331635, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Bonnieux, F., 1988. "Spécialisation régionale et efficacité de l'agriculture," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 8.
    12. Ornelas, Fermin S. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1993. "Multidimensional Evaluation Of Flexible Functional Forms For Production Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Asunka, Samuel & Shumway, C. Richard, 1996. "Allocatable Fixed Inputs and Jointness in Agricultural Production: More Implications," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 25(2), pages 143-148, October.
    14. Peichl, Andreas & Popp, Martin, 2022. "Can the Labor Demand Curve Explain Job Polarization?," IAB-Discussion Paper 202221, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    15. Tocco,Barbara & Bailey, Alastair & Davidova, Sophia, 2013. "The Theoretical Framework and Methodology to Estimate the Farm Labour and Other Factor-Derived Demand and Output Supply Systems," Factor Markets Working Papers 156, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    16. Lusk, Jayson L. & Featherstone, Allen M. & Marsh, Thomas L. & Abdulkadri, Abdullahi O., 1997. "Empirical properties of duality theory," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(1), pages 1-24.
    17. Andermann, Gerhard & Schmitt, Günther, 1996. "Die Bestimmungsgründe der Beschäftigung in der Landwirtschaft : eine quantitative Analyse der kurzfristigen Anpassung der Größe und Struktur des Arbeitskräftebestandes der Landwirtschaft im früheren B," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 29(4), pages 630-655.
    18. Norton, Nancy Anders, 1986. "The Effect Of Acreage Reduction Programs On The Production Of Corn, Wheat, And Cotton: A Profit Function Approach," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278421, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Richards, Timothy J. & Manfredo, Mark R., 2003. "Cooperative Mergers and Acquisitions: The Role of Capital Constraints," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(1), pages 1-17, April.
    20. E. Phimister & D. Roberts, 2006. "The Effect of Off-farm Work on the Intensity of Agricultural Production," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 34(4), pages 493-515, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:9:y:2002:i:13:p:889-892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.