IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v31y2024i6p555-560.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the climate and health damages of Bitcoin mining in the US: Is Bitcoin underwater?

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew L. Goodkind
  • Robert P. Berrens
  • Benjamin A. Jones

Abstract

Cryptocurrencies, such as Bitcoin (BTC), based on the proof-of-work mining production scheme create significant social costs. This analysis monetarily estimates the health and climate damages of BTC mining in the United States (US) from September 2019 to December 2021, and then compares these damages to BTC’s market price. We further show the spatial dispersion of BTC’s ‘social damage-to-market price’ ratio across US states. If this benchmark ratio is >1, then it is a clear indicator of an unsustainable technology. Results indicate significant geographic hotspots and periods when BTC mining generates social costs that exceed the market price—i.e. instances where BTC is underwater. On average, for the US, damages represented 49% of the value of the coins generated and BTC was underwater on approximately one-quarter of days between September 2019 and December 2021. Several US states have average damages that exceed the value of each BTC mined.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew L. Goodkind & Robert P. Berrens & Benjamin A. Jones, 2024. "Estimating the climate and health damages of Bitcoin mining in the US: Is Bitcoin underwater?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 555-560, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:31:y:2024:i:6:p:555-560
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2022.2140107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2022.2140107
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2022.2140107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:31:y:2024:i:6:p:555-560. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.