IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v31y2024i2p146-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A new approach on measuring the knowledge complexity in the view of the bipartite network

Author

Listed:
  • Shenshen Zhang
  • Paul Zhang

Abstract

Developed countries are guaranteed to have the ownership of higher knowledge complexity, which is naturally accepted and universally acknowledged. However, the reality may tell a different story. In this article, a brand-new approach is utilized to quantify the knowledge complexity. Within the bipartite network model, based on the Fitness and Complexity algorithm and the matrix-estimation exercise, a couple of indicators are constructed to measure generalized knowledge complexities of countries and technologies. Results illuminate that admittedly knowledge complexities of countries and those of technologies are interrelated, and those established and developed countries, compared with developing ones, do not necessarily own higher knowledge complexity. To be more specific, an increasing number of facts demonstrate that some less-developed countries with less-advanced technologies are progressing in leaps and bounds, for they attach great importance to investing in high-knowledge-complexity technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shenshen Zhang & Paul Zhang, 2024. "A new approach on measuring the knowledge complexity in the view of the bipartite network," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 146-151, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:31:y:2024:i:2:p:146-151
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2022.2128290
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2022.2128290
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2022.2128290?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:31:y:2024:i:2:p:146-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.