IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v30y2023i5p657-662.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is it better to support tourism after pandemic regionally or globally? Case of European Union from the socio-economic perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Milan Dźogan
  • Roman Lacko
  • Zuzana Hajduová

Abstract

The study is devoted to examining the tourism efficiency of European Union countries in the years after the financial crisis and before the pandemic crisis to understand the processes that can be instrumental in post-pandemic crisis measures. The DEA CCR and BCC models and truncated regression analysis were implemented to reach the study’s goal. Double bootstrapped efficiency values were detailed to cluster analysis. Our findings confirmed that measures following the Coronavirus pandemic must be directed regionally with regards to socio-economic convergence. Some tourism-oriented countries, which were more affected by the previous crisis, tend to be less efficient. And more vulnerable. Also, the convergence of countries, which joined the European Union in the last decades, is insufficient, so the efficiencies tend to be lower. We have also shown that various socio-economic factories impact efficiency, and their improvement can also mean improving the state of tourist efficiency in European Union countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Milan Dźogan & Roman Lacko & Zuzana Hajduová, 2023. "Is it better to support tourism after pandemic regionally or globally? Case of European Union from the socio-economic perspective," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(5), pages 657-662, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:5:p:657-662
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2021.2009435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2021.2009435
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2021.2009435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:30:y:2023:i:5:p:657-662. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.