IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v28y2021i7p523-530.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Appraising praise: experimental evidence on positive framing and demand for health services

Author

Listed:
  • Aderaw Anteneh
  • Kelly Bidwell
  • Woldemariam Girma
  • Kristen Little
  • Nicholas Wilson
  • Endale Workalemahu

Abstract

Standard economic models of human behaviour take the view that non-informative elements of communication (e.g. tone) do not affect behaviour. Casual observation of consumer and producer behaviour, as well as descriptive evidence, suggests this may be an overly strong assumption in many contexts, including healthcare. For example, 59% of female respondents in the 2011 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey reported that ‘rude attitude of health provider’ was a major problem that prevented them from seeking medical advice and treatment. Yet there is only a small body of evidence on the causal effects of non-informative elements of communication from real-world settings. We conducted a field experiment with over 800 HIV+ female sex workers (FSWs) in Ethiopia testing the effects of providing of Praise Message phone calls on retention in antiretroviral (ART) care and adherence to ART medication. We find mixed evidence on the effects of Praise Messages, suggesting further investigation into the effects of praise or other non-informative communication on health behaviour.

Suggested Citation

  • Aderaw Anteneh & Kelly Bidwell & Woldemariam Girma & Kristen Little & Nicholas Wilson & Endale Workalemahu, 2021. "Appraising praise: experimental evidence on positive framing and demand for health services," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 523-530, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:28:y:2021:i:7:p:523-530
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2020.1761939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2020.1761939
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2020.1761939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:28:y:2021:i:7:p:523-530. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.