IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v19y2012i1p47-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An appropriate test of the Kuznets hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Ho-Chuan (River) Huang
  • Yi-Chen Lin
  • Chih-Chuan Yeh

Abstract

The Kuznets hypothesis, that is, inequality first rises and then falls as the economy advances, is often tested by regressing inequality on income and its squared term (along with other determinants). Findings of a significantly negative coefficient on income and a significantly positive estimate on the quadratic term are commonly taken as evidence supporting the inverted-U Kuznets curve. Although intuitive, Lind and Mehlum (2010) argued that the conventional approach is flawed and proposed an appropriate test for a U-shaped association. We revisit the validity of the Kuznets hypothesis by applying the novel testing strategy of Lind and Mehlum (2010) to annual US data over the period 1917 to 2007. Inconsistent with the Kuznets hypothesis, the test results overwhelmingly reject the combined null hypothesis of an inverted-U or monotone relationship in favour of a U-shaped linkage between income inequality and economic development. Moreover, the results are robust to changes in inequality measures and functional specifications.

Suggested Citation

  • Ho-Chuan (River) Huang & Yi-Chen Lin & Chih-Chuan Yeh, 2012. "An appropriate test of the Kuznets hypothesis," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 47-51, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:19:y:2012:i:1:p:47-51
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2011.566172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2011.566172
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2011.566172?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wannaphong Durongkaveroj, 2021. "Structural transformation and inequality: Does trade openness matter?," Departmental Working Papers 2021-10, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    2. Kemal ERKİŞİ & Turgay CEYHAN, 2020. "The Relationship Between Economic Growth and Income Inequality: A Panel Data Analysis," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 28(43).
    3. Umeair Shahzad & Fukai Luo & Jing Liu, 2023. "Debt financing and technology investment Kuznets curve: Evidence from China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 751-765, January.
    4. Shinhye Chang & Matthew W. Clance & Giray Gozgor & Rangan Gupta, 2019. "A Reconsideration of Kuznets Curve across Countries: Evidence from the Co-summability Approach," Working Papers 201970, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    5. Saleem Khan & Salman Azad Khan & Muhammad Tariq, 2016. "The Analysis of Income Inequality and Economic Growth Relationship: Evidence from Pakistan9apos9s Data," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 1(1), pages 24-35, December.
    6. Adnen Ben Nasr & Mehmet Balcilar & Seyi Saint Akadiri & Rangan Gupta, 2019. "Kuznets Curve for the US: A Reconsideration Using Cosummability," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 142(2), pages 827-843, April.
    7. J. N. Lye and J. G. Hirschberg, 2012. "Inverse Test Confidence Intervals for Turning points: A," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1160, The University of Melbourne.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:19:y:2012:i:1:p:47-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.