IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v77y2023i4p443-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Wald Confidence Interval for a Binomial p as an Illuminating “Bad” Example

Author

Listed:
  • Per Gösta Andersson

Abstract

When teaching we usually not only demonstrate/discuss how a certain method works, but, not less important, why it works. In contrast, the Wald confidence interval for a binomial p constitutes an excellent example of a case where we might be interested in why a method does not work. It has been in use for many years and, sadly enough, it is still to be found in many textbooks in mathematical statistics/statistics. The reasons for not using this interval are plentiful and this fact gives us a good opportunity to discuss all of its deficiencies and draw conclusions which are of more general interest. We will mostly use already known results and bring them together in a manner appropriate to the teaching situation. The main purpose of this article is to show how to stimulate students to take a more critical view of simplifications and approximations. We primarily aim for master’s students who previously have been confronted with the Wilson (score) interval, but parts of the presentation may as well be suitable for bachelor’s students.

Suggested Citation

  • Per Gösta Andersson, 2023. "The Wald Confidence Interval for a Binomial p as an Illuminating “Bad” Example," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(4), pages 443-448, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:4:p:443-448
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2023.2183257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2023.2183257
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2023.2183257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:4:p:443-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.