IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v77y2023i4p357-369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hypothesis Testing for Matched Pairs with Missing Data by Maximum Mean Discrepancy: An Application to Continuous Glucose Monitoring

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos Matabuena
  • Paulo Félix
  • Marc Ditzhaus
  • Juan Vidal
  • Francisco Gude

Abstract

A frequent problem in statistical science is how to properly handle missing data in matched paired observations. There is a large body of literature coping with the univariate case. Yet, the ongoing technological progress in measuring biological systems raises the need for addressing more complex data, for example, graphs, strings, and probability distributions. To fill this gap, this article proposes new estimators of the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) to handle complex matched pairs with missing data. These estimators can detect differences in data distributions under different missingness assumptions. The validity of this approach is proven and further studied in an extensive simulation study, and statistical consistency results are provided. Data obtained from continuous glucose monitoring in a longitudinal population-based diabetes study are used to illustrate the application of this approach. By employing new distributional representations along with cluster analysis, new clinical criteria on how glucose changes vary at the distributional level over 5 years can be explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos Matabuena & Paulo Félix & Marc Ditzhaus & Juan Vidal & Francisco Gude, 2023. "Hypothesis Testing for Matched Pairs with Missing Data by Maximum Mean Discrepancy: An Application to Continuous Glucose Monitoring," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(4), pages 357-369, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:4:p:357-369
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2023.2200512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2023.2200512
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2023.2200512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:4:p:357-369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.