IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v77y2023i3p323-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Ethics into the Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE)

Author

Listed:
  • Rameela Raman
  • Jessica Utts
  • Andrew I. Cohen
  • Matthew J. Hayat

Abstract

Statistics education at all levels includes data collected on human subjects. Thus, statistics educators have a responsibility to educate their students about the ethical aspects related to the collection of those data. The changing statistics education landscape has seen instruction moving from being formula-based to being focused on statistical reasoning. The widely implemented Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) Report has paved the way for instructors to present introductory statistics to students in a way that is both approachable and engaging. However, with technological advancement and the increase in availability of real-world datasets, it is necessary that instruction also integrate the ethical aspects around data sources, such as privacy, how the data were obtained and whether participants consent to the use of their data. In this article, we propose incorporating ethics into established curricula and integrating ethics into undergraduate-level introductory statistics courses based on recommendations in the GAISE Report. We provide a few examples of how to prompt students to constructively think about their ethical responsibilities when working with data.

Suggested Citation

  • Rameela Raman & Jessica Utts & Andrew I. Cohen & Matthew J. Hayat, 2023. "Integrating Ethics into the Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE)," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(3), pages 323-330, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:3:p:323-330
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2156612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2022.2156612
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2022.2156612?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:3:p:323-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.