IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v77y2023i3p292-300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian Log-Rank Test

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaqi Gu
  • Yan Zhang
  • Guosheng Yin

Abstract

Comparison of two survival curves is a fundamental problem in survival analysis. Although abundant frequentist methods have been developed for comparing survival functions, inference procedures from the Bayesian perspective are rather limited. In this article, we extract the quantity of interest from the classic log-rank test and propose its Bayesian counterpart. Monte Carlo methods, including a Gibbs sampler and a sequential importance sampling procedure, are developed to draw posterior samples of survival functions and a decision rule of hypothesis testing is constructed for making inference. Via simulations and real data analysis, the proposed Bayesian log-rank test is shown to be asymptotically equivalent to the classic one when noninformative prior distributions are used, which provides a Bayesian interpretation of the log-rank test. When using the correct prior information from historical data, the Bayesian log-rank test is shown to outperform the classic one in terms of power. R codes to implement the Bayesian log-rank test are also provided with step-by-step instructions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaqi Gu & Yan Zhang & Guosheng Yin, 2023. "Bayesian Log-Rank Test," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(3), pages 292-300, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:3:p:292-300
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2161637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2022.2161637
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2022.2161637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:3:p:292-300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.