IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/amstat/v77y2023i2p223-233.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Tutorial of Bayesian Sequential Design and Reinforcement Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Mauricio Tec
  • Yunshan Duan
  • Peter Müller

Abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) is a computational approach to reward-driven learning in sequential decision problems. It implements the discovery of optimal actions by learning from an agent interacting with an environment rather than from supervised data. We contrast and compare RL with traditional sequential design, focusing on simulation-based Bayesian sequential design (BSD). Recently, there has been an increasing interest in RL techniques for healthcare applications. We introduce two related applications as motivating examples. In both applications, the sequential nature of the decisions is restricted to sequential stopping. Rather than a comprehensive survey, the focus of the discussion is on solutions using standard tools for these two relatively simple sequential stopping problems. Both problems are inspired by adaptive clinical trial design. We use examples to explain the terminology and mathematical background that underlie each framework and map one to the other. The implementations and results illustrate the many similarities between RL and BSD. The results motivate the discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of each approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Mauricio Tec & Yunshan Duan & Peter Müller, 2023. "A Comparative Tutorial of Bayesian Sequential Design and Reinforcement Learning," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(2), pages 223-233, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:2:p:223-233
    DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2022.2129787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00031305.2022.2129787
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00031305.2022.2129787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:amstat:v:77:y:2023:i:2:p:223-233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTAS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.